|
|
|
|
|
by sroerick
289 days ago
|
|
OK, I completely agree with this. That said, I'm not a nix guy, but to me, intuitively NixOS wins for this use case. It seems like you could either A. Use declarative OS installs across deployments
B. Put your app into a container which sometimes deploys it's own kernel and then sometimes doesn't and this gets pushed to a third party cloud registry, or you can set up your own registry, and then this container runs on a random ubuntu container or cloud hosting site where you basically don't administer or do any ops you just kind of use it as an empty vessel which exists to run your Docker container. I get that in practice, these are basically the same, and I think that's a testament to the massive infrastructure work Docker, Inc has done. But it just doesn't make any sense to me |
|
or you can use the `build(Layered)Image` to declaratively build an oci image with whatever inside it. I think you can mix and match the approaches.
but yes I'm personally a big fan of Nix's solution to the "works on my machine" problem. all the reproducibility without the clunkiness of having to shell into a special dev container, particularly great for packaging custom tools or weird compilers or other finnicky things that you want to use, not serve.