|
|
|
|
|
by NoGravitas
290 days ago
|
|
The barter myth is just that, a myth. Barter has never been observed in any society that had not previously been using money. Money, in fact, appears to arise not organically, but from the need early states to maintain standing armies. Creating markets denominated in currency allows you to simply pay your troops rather than maintaining their entire supply chain even when not on the march. And then requiring that taxes be paid in currency gives everyone a reason to accept currency for payment. It transforms your entire economy into a machine for feeding soldiers. This is not a thought experiment like the barter myth; it is documented in ancient sources from India, Mesopotamia, and China. An article treatment:
https://archive.is/20250725000932/https://www.theatlantic.co... A book treatment (that of course covers many other things):
https://archive.org/details/DebtTheFirst5000Years |
|