|
|
|
|
|
by tpm
284 days ago
|
|
Again you completely failed to engage with the main point - that a foreign country is occupying most of Palestine and that it is mass murdering Palestinians. > Your GP post says 3 conditions justify reacting against civilians You also seem to either misunderstand or disregard what I wrote. That is plainly rude. Go back and read it again. |
|
So clearly we should boycott just all muslims, since your claim is that that justifies boycotting civilians from those countries.
The whole of "islam" was not a religion until at least 1930, but an empire, which is another name for an organization that ONLY occupies other countries and populations and mass murders and exploits them. The hadith state that all of islam, country and people are the personal property of the caliph (who is allowed to, for example, kill anyone, muslim, dhimmi or slave, for any reason, making islam even more inhumane than the Romans were. This explains what current muslims pretend not to comprehend: that their grandparents were overwhelmingly very happy to see islam, the empire, end). Muslim empires have always done this exploiting through slavery, until at least 1970. There are regular accusations to middle eastern muslims that they still do so. So this is not exactly a surprise. So that's a further justification to boycott all muslims, no?
In fact Israel is an example of a region and a local population that WAS occupied by the Ottoman empire and fought itself free. In that view the conflict is entirely the reverse of what you claim it is.
But you're a racist, so none of this matters. What I'm misunderstanding is that arguments can only be used against Jews, and how much the same arguments apply to anyone else doesn't matter.