[GoblinSlayer]

>Logical positivism is flawed because the principle of verification cannot be verified.

Why not? It works, thus it verifies itself.

[rcxdude]

So do an infinite number of sets of statements which include a false one. Circular arguments are obviously not reliable.

[GoblinSlayer]

That's a hypothesis of a counterexample, though, not a fact of a counterexample.

[goatlover]

It's not working if it excludes subjective experience by definition. Makes it useless for the consciousness debate.

[GoblinSlayer]

It doesn't exclude subjective experience.