|
|
|
|
|
by edoceo
293 days ago
|
|
Typically they start with something like: by using this $SERVICE you AGREE to blah-blah-blah ($X) If you agree to $X but then don't do it: you're a liar. The terms might be shit. But if you agree to shit terms you should be bound by shit terms. In the olden days: "I gave my word as a gentleman and a scholar" or "a deals a deal, even with a dirty dealer"[0]. Going back on a deal is not ethical; end of. [0] I think it from Futurama. |
|
Furthermore, these "use the service or not" agreements is like saying "accept a government or leave the country". Being handed an ultimatum saying "agree or you can't participate with your peers culturally, and potentially can't even access other local services such as government announcements", that's basically not a deal as there is no negotiation, that's being informed by greater powers of the pound of flesh they expect to extract.
Yes, yes I know the law says if you don't agree then you should simply not use the Internet, simple as that. That's clearly not even a possibility to be a functioning member of society at this point, but I guess it'll take some time for the law to catch up.