|
|
|
|
|
by robenkleene
289 days ago
|
|
This is such a funny example because language is the main way that we communicate with LLMs. Which means you can make tie both of your points together in the same example: If you take a scene and describe it in words, then have an LLM reconstruct the scene from the description, you'd likely get a scene that looks very different then the original source. This simultaneous makes both your point and the person you're responding to's point: 1. Language is an abstraction and it's not deterministic (it's really lossy) 2. LLMs behave differently than the abstractions involved in building software, where normally if you gave the same input, you'd expect the same output. |
|