|
|
|
|
|
|
by Amadiro
283 days ago
|
|
|
It's even worse than that, because the way they extract the causal link is just a regex, so "vaccines > autism" because "Even though the article was fraudulent and was retracted, 1 in 4 parents still believe vaccines can cause autism." I think this could be solved much better by using even a modestly powerful LLM to do the causal extraction... The website claims "an estimated extraction precision of 83% " but I doubt this is an even remotely sensible estimate. |
|
|