|
|
|
|
|
|
by VladVladikoff
296 days ago
|
|
|
For a brief overview on a topic the accuracy is good enough. It might get some minor details wrong but they are generally superfluous to the topic, it typically breaks down when you are really getting into the weeds of a topic, or really niche subjects, at which point you have exceeded the utility of the LLMs.
I have read many blog posts linked off 1st ranking position google queries in the past and found their answers to have inaccuracies as well, how is that better? |
|
|
It's roughly as bad, if you assume the same degree of trust in both scenarios. I don't make that assumption. I get the sense that people are more likely to trust the AI answer at the top of the search results page or handed back to them in a ChatGPT conversation than they are to totally buy a random blogger. If I'm wrong, then great.