[freehorse]

This is sort of how it works, but usually there is a process of reviewing and asking questions during interviews rather than just voting. In any case, both voting and reviewing require one to read a lot of grant proposals. The problem is that an overworked scientist reviewing grants may just resort to LLMs for that.

[robwwilliams]

This is disallowed by NIH for confidentiality concerns. But reviewer are free to submit the applicants paper to an LLM for commentary. Useful to detect traces of p-hacking that require careful teading.