Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pr337h4m 297 days ago
> The strategy we use relies on the referer header we see when we get an HTTP/S request.

This is interesting data but is not really a useful estimate of search engine market share in 2025.

1 comments

And one that would understate privacy-focused search engines, because the people using those are far less likely to be sending useful referrers.
What search engines don't send referrer headers?
I was expecting DDG to be one of them (before I read the report), so I did some digging and it seems that they have <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Reference/...> set to "origin", meaning it says that the request came from duckduckgo.com but nothing further

  <meta name="referrer" content="origin">
But, to answer your question, presumably a search engine that wanted to stay really under the radar could use that same mechanism to choose "no-referrer" and the traffic would seem organic

(I also had a good chuckle at them choosing to break the typo chain with this directive)

Referrers (or cross-domain referrers) can be easily disabled in the browser - it's not just up to the search engine.