|
|
|
|
|
by Terretta
296 days ago
|
|
Just as in the linked article, these two statements make it pretty clear: > A) It should be harder for non-technical users to accidentally install apps designed to harm them. > B) It should also be possible for anyone to run whatever code they want on hardware they own Require something in the neighborhood of: C) It should be possible to prevent people who can run whatever they want from wanting* to intentionally or accidentally install apps designed to harm them; or, where these harms are either not harmful or are reversible. If you consider things that help with (C), and apply this principle — “Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith." — then a lot of iOS/iPadOS developer and app ecosystem can be understood as positive intentionality around flavors of C. * By being scammed, persuaded, misled, confused, coerced, etc. |
|