|
|
|
|
|
|
by d_sem
298 days ago
|
|
|
New information that challenges one's context can often appear weird at first. Its a common reaction. Regarding psychohistory: It's worth considering the era in which the books where written. The 1st half of the 20th century saw massive innovations in economic theory, physics, and information theory. It was not a big leap to predict that in 500 years time, humans would further advance macro economics. Personally I felt the books did a great job setting limits in the capabilities of the theory, and using its inherit flaws to drive interesting plot lines. |
|
|