[zakirullin]

> I like the article but the people who need it won't understand it

That's true. One doesn't change his mindset just after reading. Even after some mentorship the results are far from satisfying. Engineers can completely agree with you on the topic, only to go and do just the opposite.

It seems like the hardest thing to do is to build a feedback loop - "what decisions I made in past -> what it led to". Usually that loop takes a few years to complete, and most people forget that their architecture decisions led to a disaster. Or they just disassociate themselves.

[lll-o-lll]

One of the big troubles is that if you join a big org you won’t get to do any architecture until you are at least “senior” or “lead”. Maybe that’s not true everywhere, but I have seen a fair bit of it. You need several iterations of “I built a thing” “oh, the thing evolved in horrible ways”, before the instincts for good architecture are developed.

I think Big Orgs need to develop younger promising talent by letting them build small green fields projects. Essentially fostering startups inside the organisation proper. Let them build and learn from mistakes (while providing the necessary knowledge; you can actually learn most of this from books, but experience is the ultimate teacher). Otherwise you end up with 5 year experienced people who cannot design themselves out of a paper bag.

[fireflash38]

It's not helped by the "jump every 2 years for 20-50% pay bump". They don't have to deal with their own architectural decisions.

[wreath]

In an industry where most people stay for around 2 years (at least pre 2022), people arent even there to see the results of their decisions.