[throwaway81523]

Yes, Whitaker & Watson (analysis), Hardy and Wright (number theory), Dieudonne (analysis and he was literally a Bourbaki member), heck, Euclid's Elements; Gauss Disquisitiones, etc. Bourbaki is more of a monument. Writing it was necessary, but for readers it suffices to know that it is there ;).

[Davidzheng]

while it's certainly not read by most mathematicians, Bourbaki (especially set theory & general topology) are still quite often read by mathematicians in training I believe.

[throwaway81523]

The set theory book is, at best, very outdated. No idea about topology.

[euiq]

General Topology is valuable, especially for the filter perspective; so are some of the Algebra volumes.