Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by zdouglas 5026 days ago
I was mainly referring to the implication by omission that Blizzard had nefarious intent with its watermarking. Though, my comment was itself inflammatory; karma's a jerk.
2 comments

The title, as currently, written, "Blizzard is secretly watermarking WOW screenshots" is pretty generic (and entirely accurate - They are watermarking WOW screenshots, and it is being done secretly).

I'm curious as to what your title would have been:

"Blizzard watermarking WOW screenshots?" - This is less informative, but removes the word "secretly?"

What is the omission in the title, and what title would you suggest? The title does not, to me, imply any nefarious intent.