|
|
|
|
|
by jibal
295 days ago
|
|
> What's the error? a) prose doesn't have intentions ... it should be "prose intended to" b) "effect of", not "affect of" > I don't see what I'd call an actual error. That's a serious problem. It's downright weird that you thought he was actually talking about affect (the noun). This is an old conversation ... I won't revisit it. |
|
But it’s possible I was reading too generously and this was a botched attempt to employ “effect”, which would also fit (and better, I think).