|
|
|
|
|
|
by hellojesus
299 days ago
|
|
|
Iirc, there was case law where a site was successfully found guilty because the site allowed ads, and the advertisers were targeting based on ip location. Not the site! The site didn't even log that data. But the ads were used as the vector of purposful availment. When I get the time, I'll be hosting a site from my closet that allows anything short of csam and I will reject states like MS and TX. My final act will be to die. But I don't much want to live. |
|
|
Anyway find a reason to live, unless you're objectively suffering there's quite a few