Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
xyse53
295 days ago
I've found QEMUs microvm to be faster at boot while having nicer tooling and a cleaner upgrade path if needing more features. Aside from hype I'm actually not sure why anyone would still use firecracker.
1 comments
monocasa
294 days ago
Mainly because of the much larger attack surface of QEMU.
link
xyse53
293 days ago
I can't quantify how much of that surface is also reduced with the microvm machine vs other parts of QEMU vs Firecracker... But fair enough point.
link