| > Reading it I have no idea if "support for volunteers" means supporting wikipedia editors, corporate, donations I think its pretty clear that "support for volunteers" does not mean corporate. I too would like more detailed budgets, but we do have some info here. > Usually non-profit organizations like this get significant corporate funding because they do work for companies and political organizations The list of large donors is public https://wikimediafoundation.org/annualreports/2023-2024-annu... there are only 27 who gave > $50000. Which ones do you think Wikipedia is giving biased coverage to? I'd also point out that there is a wall of separation between editors and the foundation. > all you have to do is look at their URL blacklists to figure that out. The NYT is regarded as a high quality link, meanwhile you're not even allowed to link the epoch times as a reference despite it being the most comparable right-wing competitor to the NYT. Basically every major right-wing paper is banned, while every major left-wing paper is allowed Discussion about epoch times at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Not... my understanding is the concern is around them promoting conspiracy theories without evidence not their political alignment. |
That might be their justification but is it actually true?
Specifically: Do you believe that every major right-wing paper promotes conspiracy theories while every major left-wing paper does not?