|
|
|
|
|
by cogman10
300 days ago
|
|
I'm on the fence. On the one hand I love the power of TS types that they can expose. On the other, I've seen a class of dev that, instead of relying on simple types, will try and make a monstrosity type that does unholy things. I feel a little bit about it like I feel about RegEx. Small and simple are good, but once you start diving into the entire catalog of regex capabilities for a single expression you've made a mistake. |
|
Totally agree, however that love of complexity will just squeeze into something else had they not had types to have fun with.