[os2warpman]

>You are projecting an ideology onto these people for no reason other than to satisfy your own bias and/or earn a few cheap upvotes from likeminded readers.

No, I read what they said during the interviews used in the article.

[potato3732842]

Which you didn't quote or reference and who's commentary was included because it is noteworthy, eye catching or controversial, not because it is representative.

It ain't no different than the 5am news person interviewing people off the streets and only the "interesting" responses making the 7am news.

If we want to compare family anecdotes I can trot out my own but that's not the point.

[os2warpman]

You don't need to pull quotes or provide references in a comment about the article you've just read and are commenting on.[1]

Of course, I read every word of the article instead of just the title, or skimming it, or having an AI summarize it and spoon feed it to me like I am a baby, and I expect others to do the same.

[1] common fucking sense