[bob1029]

The backwards compatibility also means that the frustration over concurrency and synchronization is largely a waste of time. Most SQLite builds are created such that all activity is serialized through a single mutex by default.

> In serialized mode, API calls to affect or use any SQLite database connection or any object derived from such a database connection can be made safely from multiple threads.

https://www.sqlite.org/threadsafe.html

Many libraries get this wrong and make it unsafe to use from multiple threads despite the underlying provider being capable. I think these are effectively bugs that should be resolved.

In my C# applications, I use System.Data.SQLite and share a single SQLiteConnection instance across the entire app. This connection instance typically gets injected as the first service, so I can just take a param on it any time I need to talk to SQL. Absolutely no synchronization occurs in my code. I've tried Microsoft.Data.Sqlite but it seems to have rare problems with sharing connections between threads.

[ncruces]

In Go, a database/sql “connection” is actually a pool, and Go makes sure that it only calls driver methods serially for an actual driver connection from a single goroutine.

So your point (which is not very clear to me, with my limited knowledge of C# and SDS) is largely moot in Go terms.