|
|
|
|
|
by msylvest
294 days ago
|
|
I remember admiring the intent of XSLT when it was born. And how difficult it turned out to be to write; using XML framing makes it terse/verbose/arcane, eg. when compared to the compactness of regex/subs. It is 2025 and now we've got LLMs to write our code - that may actually be a strong argument in favor of keeping XSL(T): It is a useful browser mechanism and LLMs makes it easier to harvest. Does anybody have experience with LLM-generated XSL(T)? |
|
My previous change in this file was in 2017 when I replaced xalan by the xslt processor built in java. I was very surprised I had to make the following changes:
These incompatibility issues with something I considered to be standard greatly damaged my opinion on xslt.