[NoteyComplexity]

So… what does it prove? Do you learn anything?

Just because Alpha go exist back in the days, go competition doesn’t go away. Just because ChatGpt exists these days, it doesn’t replace our desires of learning something more interactively.

ChatGPT can answer many things, but it seems miss the point if you use it for a website designed for learning.

[wfhrto]

ChatGPT can solve the problems for me. I can spend my time doing other things other than learning stuff it can do.

[NoteyComplexity]

Fr, what is the “other stuff” you all claims to be? Since I have heard many people who heavily use AI claimed to save time for “other stuff”, but I never heard about what is their “other stuff”.

If what you actually want to do is not really related to shader, there is a huge chance you have started your learning process in a wrong direction, which is a bit different to the definition of “being efficient”.

So tell me what you want to do.

[deadbabe]

They will just write more AI prompts.

There is no point where a vibe coder will put down their glasses and say “I will now write this code by hand”.

[wfhrto]

Literally no reason to write code by hand, ever again

[maplethorpe]

Does being able to solve basic computer graphics problems mean ChatGPT can solve all computer graphics problems? If not, does that mean advanced computer graphics problems fit into the bucket of "things that are worth learning?"

Because if the advanced problems are worth learning, but the basic problems are not worth learning, how are you supposed to jump straight to learning the advanced stuff while skipping the rest? You'll inevitably end up needing to learn the basics first anyway.

[KeplerBoy]

This mindset will be the great filter for kids these days.

Yes, LLMs are sort of competent in many, many areas, but if you refuse to learn stuff the LLM can do, you will fail miserably to spot when the LLM is incompetent.