[tomrod]

Thank you again for your thoughts, this will be my last response to you since, based on our interaction, I believe you want the last word. You are substantively incorrect in assertions. You have yet move beyond an assertion that "Georgism is Marxism." I have provided both justification why you assertion is invalid, and pointed out that leading economists of all stripes (orthodox and heterodox) consider a land value tax to both be minimally distortive.

Thanks for the opportunity to present Georgism as a superior policy over the clamor in your prior comments.

[mothballed]

Alright, I stand corrected. Georgism is Marxism for everything it actually is called upon to operate on in practice, which is the land, which by your own omission goes uncontested.