|
|
|
|
|
by lmm
5023 days ago
|
|
My first job was at a company that made the UK's fastest growing list something like five times in a row. Eight years after being founded by two guys in their college room it was sold for GBP100m. Prior to that sale we never had a dedicated DBA. Our two and a half sysadmins kept MySQL up to date and handled the replication setup for teams that didn't want to do it themselves (which was perhaps 2/3). Table layout and query optimization were left entirely up to developers. It worked far better than the setup at either of my subsequent jobs, which have been postgres and oracle with dedicated DBAs. |
|
I have one customer who has a couple of sysadmins do all that for both MySQL and PostgreSQL servers. If that's all you need, you probably don't need a dedicated DBA unless you are running Oracle and that's just because with Oracle your DBA can always find something to do.
If MySQL can be said to make DBA's obsolete because it doesn't take that much maintenance, Informix beat them to that by a few decades.