[bigyabai]

He's like a neoconservative Žižek. His party uses him to confuse and anger opponents, as a method to deflect criticism away from matters concerning policy or influence.

His original bibliography is largely ignored in polsci circles, found most often next to a print copy of Protocols of the Elders or somesuch conspiracy.

[ai_critic]

Perhaps, but Zizek is at least funny and so on and so on.

[PestoDiRucola]

There's nothing neoconservative about his ideology. He's some sort of monarchist paleoconservative.

[bigyabai]

There's nothing liberal about Slavoj, for most eastern Europeans. Nevertheless, European conservatives treat him like some sort of intelligentsia final boss when in reality he's just a kinda pissed-off dad with a Marxism fetish. I think Yarvin has become a similarly pointless flashpoint discussion topic, a sort of liberal boogeyman to wheel out when people demand more democracy or social benefits.

I don't really take issue with people who write this sort of literature, but I also don't take it very seriously myself.