|
|
|
|
|
by pimlottc
301 days ago
|
|
I was wondering about the “correctness” of the z-axis movement for the spherical helix. You could pick lots of different functions, including simple linear motion (z = c * t). This would obviously affect the thickness and consistency of the “peels”. The equation used creates a visually appealing result but I’m wondering what a good goal would be in terms of consistency in the distance between the spirals, or evenness in area divided, or something like that. How was this particular function selected? Was it derived in some way or simply hand-selected to look pleasing? |
|
The actual "correct" thing to do would probably be to have the point maintain constant speed in 3D space like a real boat sailing on a globe, right? But that's a rather bigger lift:
with outputs, I doubt that they did the ln(tan(phi/2)) thing though, but it's what you get when you integrate the k d{phi} = sin{phi} d{theta} equation that you have here.