|
|
|
|
|
by primitivesuave
301 days ago
|
|
First want to say that I sincerely appreciate you working on this problem. The proliferation of deepfakes is something that virtually every technology industry is dealing with right now. Suppose that deepfake technology progressed to the point where it is still detectable by your technology, but is impossible for the naked eye. In that scenario (which many would call an eventuality), wouldn't you also be compelled to serve as an authoritative entity on the detection of deepfakes? Imagine a future politician who is caught on video doing something scandalous, or a court case where someone is questioning the veracity of some video evidence. Are the creators of deepfake detection algorithms going to testify as expert witnesses, and how could they convince a human judge/jury that the output of their black box algorithm isn't a false positive? |
|
As for synthetic content that is undetectable to the naked eye or ear, we are already there.