[StopDisinfo910]

The comments here really remind of the usual debate around Wikipedia.

Some people really want to see these tools as guardian and judge determining what should be worthy of inclusion rather than tools describing a reality external to them.

Maybe old age really is a shipwreck after all.

[immibis]

Wikipedia is a guardian and judge, whether it wants to be or not. Look how quickly politicians changed their policies after Wikipedia stopped bothsidesing the Gaza war. There were endless arguments on talk pages about how it shouldn't be called the "Israel-Hamas war" any more, since it's converted into a genocide of one side only. For more than a year. And then suddenly, once they agreed to change it, within only a couple of months, politicians across the USA and Europe start sanctioning Israel for committing a genocide. The same politicians who all the rest of the time said there was no genocide. Wikipedia is more powerful than it thinks.

[JambalayaJimbo]

Are you sure you’re not mixing up cause and effect here?