|
|
|
|
|
by Juliate
305 days ago
|
|
I am not accusing, I am perceiving that from your stance. No. You should derive from that that human life, and humanities being part of that, are a matter of experience, more than of argument/convincing. I could spend some time to argue with you about that, but you're showing you are not open to such a discussion, and my time is more valuable (and yours) than that. It's like sex, intimacy, sight, smell, touch: you can't argue about it or explain it to someone who never experienced it. It's definitely hard to argue or demonstrate how sometimes a book, a painting, a music can turn around your whole perspective on things. |
|
Which means that humanities cannot be important to mankind as a whole, because most won't appreciate them, as they are a matter of taste. And they are as arbitrary as other matters of taste, lacking the universality that is necessary for usefulness. Good riddance!