[jjaksic]

That seems fair and accurate.

I guess disagreement about this question often stems from what we mean by "human", even more than what we mean by "intelligence".

There are at least 3 distinct categories of human intelligence/capability in any given domain:

1) average human (non-expert) - LLMs are already better (mainly because the average human doesn't know anything, but LLMs at least have some basic knowledge),

2) domain expert humans - LLMs are far behind, but can sometimes supplement human experts with additional breadth,

3) collective intelligence of all humans combined - LLMs are like retarded cavemen in comparison.

So when answering if AI has human-level intelligence, it really makes sense to ask what "human-level" means.