Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by yorhel 5028 days ago
Odd-sounding request: Is it possible to have an option to not use gpg, or any encryption, at all? I only store my passwords on a LUKS loopback file, which I mount/umount as I need to access some information on it. The double-encryption does not really add any better security, but does add another password to type. I'd love to make use of the nice looking pass interface: A password generator, copy-to-clipboard, and simple management operations.
1 comments

I'd still recommend using gpg so you get the nice time-out features of gpg-agent, but otherwise, if you still don't want to use it, sure, it's trivial.

Change calls to "gpg" to "cat" in the source code. It's less than 300 lines of simple shell script. Poke around and it shouldn't take more than 2 minutes to alter.