[genrader]

No, because one built a civilization and the other is actual nonsense

[staticman2]

>>>No, because one built a civilization and the other is actual nonsense

If you believe the bible isn't superstitious nonsense then maybe you should say that directly.

"One built a civilization" describes a lot of religious books and seems to be a non sequitur.

Of course "The bible is like this occult book except the bible is true" isn't a very interesting argument.

[GuB-42]

This makes me realize that despite the association between the occult and horrible things. So many more people died in the name of the Bible.

The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written. It certainly built a thriving civilization, but it came at a cost.

[naasking]

> The Bible may be the deadliest book ever written.

Books are excuses for war that would have already happened. They would have just found other reasons if the Bible didn't exist.

[tmcdos]

Maybe that's one of the reasons they created the Bibble. Notice the word "created" and not "wrote".

[tclancy]

Please clarify, instructions unclear.

[donkeybeer]

The Romans built a civilization

[ryandv]

Just about as nonsense as Plato and the cave allegory, I agree.