|
|
|
|
|
by the8472
305 days ago
|
|
> In a way it's not a fair comparison, Indeed. And the comparison is unnecessarily unfair. You're comparing the dynamic range of a single exposure on a camera vs. the adaptive dynamic range in multiple environments for human eyes. Cameras do have comparable features: adjustable exposure times and apertures.
Additionally cameras can also sense IR, which might be useful for driving in the dark. |
|
A system that replicates the human eye's rapid aperture adjustment and integration of images taken at quickly changing aperture/ filter settings is very much not what Tesla is putting in their cars.
But again, the argument is fine in principle. It's just that you can't buy a camera that performs like the human visual system today.