|
|
|
|
|
by latexr
309 days ago
|
|
They did define it, and its opposite, over several posts when relevant for the specific point. For example (emphasis mine): > (…) many outfits in the past looked great because they conferred distinctive shapes — a boxier shirt, fuller pants, short shorts, etc. (…) > (…) the man in the white t-shirt and fuller legged pants looks better than the man in the blue polo because the higher rise pants lends better proportions. > (…) I think McQueen looks better here because the t-shirt on the right is just too long. (…) > (…) their trousers often drape well because they are cut from heavier wool fabrics. (…) There are more, but I think those get the point across. |
|