[_swfb]

Outside of some jobs requiring LinkedIn, I've never actually heard of anyone being declined for not having social media.

I haven't had a Facebook account since 2015, I don't have an Instagram and I hadn't updated my Twitter for years until I deleted it (about two hours ago). As far as I'm aware, a lack of social media presence hasn't been a factor.

Only social media I have now is Hacker News.

[Terretta]

> I've never actually heard of anyone being declined for not having social media

In late June 2025, the US announced that for inbound students from abroad it will be screening socials, and lack of an unlocked social footprint may be a disqualifier.

This brings the gov in line with private industry, as employers that do actual background checks (as opposed to, say, credit checks) are shown flags if socials are all locked or none exist.

This matters most in industries which are required by their regulators to do and/or maintain backgrounds.

[_swfb]

Oh my.

I'm not sure why that would be suspicious. If I were planning nefarious stuff, it's not like it would be hard for me to make have a social media presence to fly under the radar.

[esseph]

You wouldn't know if you were declined, you'd just be another application they wouldn't respond to, or just get a generic message

[_swfb]

Yeah that's fair.

It's probably still better overall to have no social media compared to social media with edgy takes.

[oinfoalgo]

I think lack of social media makes me stand out.

I always say I am the type of person who would post too often so instead of having social media I just read non-fiction books.

So far no one has held being well read against me.

Often, it flips to a book recommendation actually. At that point good luck with your social media when I pick a book that fits perfectly in with the marketing of myself getting the job, create a whole interesting conversation in that direction, while they read some inane nonsense from the social media poster.