|
|
|
|
|
|
by lcnPylGDnU4H9OF
308 days ago
|
|
|
> I don't think there's anything wrong with trying to reduce the crime. This is the bailey of your motte and bailey argument. The motte is the implication that the National Guard should do this (or rather, shouldn't not do this). Regardless of it being good to try to reduce crime, this is a bad way to try to reduce crime. |
|
|