[taherchhabra]

Just yesterday my son built a zombie shooter game in chatgpt, then shared the link with his friend, both were able to play individually, then my son asked can we play together and shoot each other. I was wondering is there something like localstorage but for network which chatgpt can easily use it. Can this work for my son's use case?

[adrai]

Yes — that’s exactly the kind of thing Vaultrice is designed for.

Think of it like localStorage, but instead of being tied to one browser on one device, the data lives in a globally-available, real-time object. Any change one player makes (like moving their character or firing a shot) can be sent instantly to the other player’s browser — without having to set up your own server or WebSocket layer.

For your son’s zombie shooter: • Each game session could be one Vaultrice “object” (with an id like game-123). • Each player writes their position, health, actions to that object. • The other player’s browser listens for changes and updates the game state instantly. • Presence tracking is built-in, so you can show “who’s in the game” without extra code.

The nice part is that the SDK’s API feels familiar — setItem, getItem, and on() for events — so you can get a working multiplayer prototype with just a few lines. If you want even less boilerplate, the SyncObject API lets you just set properties on a shared object and Vaultrice syncs it behind the scenes.

It won’t handle game physics for you, but it’s a fast, simple way to make a turn-based or moderately real-time multiplayer experience without hosting your own backend.

[Gys]

The two players would be two users?

[adrai]

Don't know exactly what you mean by users... users in the Game... probably yes. users in Vaultrice... no, in Vaultrice that would be 1 object (per game) of 1 class

[Gys]

I meant for Vaultrice. From your pricing page it is not clear what counts as a user. I guess I am confused by clients vs users.