|
|
|
|
|
by quesera
316 days ago
|
|
I think this is probably correct. But I'm not sure that 40hrs is the sweet spot. Other countries have chosen differently (with comparisons difficult to draw). There are several competing influences here: inflation, AI productivity gains (TBD but nonzero), existing legislation around health insurance obligations, social/economic inertia, etc. And definitely others I'm not smart enough to think of! It'd be interesting, if it was possible, to ramp down the 40hrs by an hour or two every year, keeping other components (esp healthcare) in step, to see where the inflection point is. I feel confident that we could get down to 32hrs without major negative drama. I agree that 18hrs (suggested elsewhere) would be violent. |
|