|
|
|
|
|
|
by mrweasel
313 days ago
|
|
|
If that's true the x.com is brilliant. I think you can have to short, to generic domains for them to be actually useful/descriptive. For instance I think chatgpt.com is better branding that just chat.com. Also tinycapital.com → tiny.com, capital.com works, but tiny.com doesn't really tell you anything. |
|
|