|
|
|
|
|
by adonese
304 days ago
|
|
I can see the author's point but im failing to link it to ai. The ai im using now is a good as a productivity booster for otherwise already well defined problem-- and decently good engineers. I dont think the layoffs are due to that. It is affecting entry jobs rather badly, but that (anecdotely) constitutes minority. |
|
The ADP Chief economist said that the problem wasn't that companies are laying off, is that they aren't replacing attrition - - that they can get the same work done without doing so and hinted at AI productivity boost as a reason.
I know it's a raging battle here, but just simply having a search engine that works again is a huge productivity gain...