Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by strict9 312 days ago
I agree with many of the author's observations. I see a lot of the same thing in my circles.

Where my views differ are when it comes to the leap between layoffs and AI.

Corporate leadership is eager to reduce the biggest source of cost (employees) and happy to use AI as cover. But it's not the reality. AI isn't adding productivity to the company's bottom line in numbers big enough to rationalize the layoffs.

I can point to zero tech roles eliminated where AI performed the same function. Despite the fact me and everyone in my circles use AI on a daily basis and are big proponents of it.

I think the author's biggest incorrect assertion is accepting corporate PR as gospel like this:

>Salesforce says AI bots now do 50% of the company's work. They're pushing what they call a "digital workforce" where AI agents handle customer service, sales, and even coding tasks.

All of these companies have great incentive to say AI is replacing workers. But so far no proof has been offered.

Eventually we will get a recession. For a lot of people that work in tech it feels like we are already in one.

But I do not share the author's concerns with AI taking everyone's jobs in the next few months or years.

1 comments

"Tech" layoffs are a canary.

But not because of tech, AI, or things like that. It's the rate of pay.

When prosperity is the thing that's receding, money counts more than ever because lack of money threatens more than could be imagined.

And even though it's not as common as it should be, employees can be fairly valued as an asset. In a good way, where you're much happier being valued like that than not.

So even a company that values their people more so than most, will have to make sacrifices on all fronts when the going gets rough, like they don't have to do for years in a row when things are merely non-ideal.

This can cause some of the highest-paid people to get kicked out much earlier, like few have seen before. Even in companies that are not trying to preserve as much head-count until things turn around, they may have no real choice.

A lot of non-tech high-dollar people are also being shed, and it looks like on the increase. Consumers may not have enough accumulated wealth any more to be able to bail out a consumer economy.