There’s a lot of info about what those terms mean if you click on them, more than I think would make sense to quote, but the reason I mention it is that I noticed that info the other day when I saw the news and posted it to HN. I’m not sure what the corrections are, as I haven’t seen the corrected version, just the abstract and pre-print, thanks to you again.
This looks correct. I noticed this part on the ScienceDirect page for this paper:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S24681...
> In Press, Corrected Proof
There’s a lot of info about what those terms mean if you click on them, more than I think would make sense to quote, but the reason I mention it is that I noticed that info the other day when I saw the news and posted it to HN. I’m not sure what the corrections are, as I haven’t seen the corrected version, just the abstract and pre-print, thanks to you again.