[ameliaquining]

You are correct that my math was a little off; by the time it hit 50 comments the skeptics were starting to prevail. That said, at 30 comments I think the comments section as a whole was still credulous. Here's my attempt at recreating what it was like then: https://ameliaquining.neocities.org/tesla-hn-comments

Note that I put all the comments in reverse chronological order because historical vote data isn't available, so which comments are at the top here isn't necessarily reflective of which ones were at the top at the time.

You can judge for yourself whether my summary was misleading.

[eurleif]

Agree that while the skeptics eventually won out, the thread was very credulous for a while. I recall that at the time I made my skeptical comment, there was almost no skepticism in the thread at all.

[motorest]

> You are correct that my math was a little off; by the time it hit 50 comments the skeptics were starting to prevail.

I think you didn't even bothered to read your own citation.

The first comment literally leads with "This isn't real".

The bulk of replies are questioning the questionable claims, and asking for their sources.

There are indeed a few comments from gullible people, but to frame this as gullible people being prevalent in the thread is outright wrong, as your own source shows.

[ameliaquining]

"First comment" here merely means the most recent comment, not the one that was at the top at the time, because, again, that data isn't available.

By my count, five comments expressed some kind of overt skepticism, and another four included a "if this is true" disclaimer without indicating any particular grounds to disbelieve it. The other 21 all either explicitly accepted the story as true, or implicitly didn't care whether it was true or not (e.g., piling onto criticism of Tesla without mentioning the specific controversy).