|
|
|
|
|
by runsWphotons
318 days ago
|
|
"Strict laws and licensing requirements mean nothing if it is still trivial to gain access." So have more police to enforce the laws? Why is there this belief that increasing police cannot do anything? Again, I bet this works and that DC has lower crime during the period the NG is there. It is empirical, let's see. |
|
How would a military force without the training or skillset required to do this help? Without the community knowledge? Without the contacts in it?
The issue isn't whether or not more (and better trained) police would help - they almost certainly would. But that is different from deploying the national guard.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1805161115 https://www.csis.org/analysis/sending-national-guard-dc-wron...
The other problem is that even if crime rates are reduced, that is one statistic in a vacuum - how much damage does it do to public perception of the police? We know it does - see above. What incidents might occur from the lack of training the NG has in policing civilians? What damages does it do to the fundamental freedoms within the country?