| > internally I end up having thoughts like this that I typically only feel safe sharing non-anonymously with people who are close. Ever tried flipping the lid on this?
You'd start opening up a lot of people. Those who would try to use that against you or judge have no relevance since they are not close anyway. > why the traditionalists/far right haven’t taken this propaganda approach ... they have little, low quality sex and any debate about it would force them to face this, even though it barely matters to them but admitting weakness with something so brutally natural is way above their heads. if they didn't "make" their partner orgasm, ever, are they real men or gay men in disguise? (their thoughts, not mine, I think they are gay for other reasons) it's similar to how young people used to or still do laugh about older men needing Viagra. b) traditionalists and far right have build a merry go round in a dead end, "Sackgasse" in German. it's a top down dogma. they cannot have arguments that extend established ways of reasoning before their kind has engineered context and research within which their reasoning follows proper logic (see Quillete (don't) for lots of examples, or rationalists and autistic people easily running with the magic money herd). they end up having to face the secret life's and thoughts of their partners, realizing they were actively kept in line so that their superiors and peers can reign freely vs having to compete with them, which would extend their minds, freedom and literal happiness. |
This is funny to mention, because studies on sex life show the opposite: https://www.peterhaas.org/why-church-attendees-have-the-best...