[NooneAtAll3]

I can easily point to deception in two words

1) Hard 2) Words

"Should there be a reform of our justice system" -> "should the law be passed"

"emphasis", "restitution", "compensation" -> too hard to skim, brain is bailing out

---

the only way to provide valid direct democracy is to provide more than enough explanations and rewordings from both sides of the debate *at the point of voting* to remove miscommunication

[anigbrowl]

I agree that it's unnecessarily wordy, but I still don't think it's deceptive. If your brain is bailing out that fast maybe it's better not to vote.

[xvector]

Hard disagree. Systems must be designed with typical human fallibilities in mind.

Anyone that phrases a referendum like that ought to be sentenced to hard labor themselves for attempting to subvert democracy.

[anigbrowl]

This isn't a system, it's a sentence. It's not that hard to read 13 more words.