Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by FireBeyond 316 days ago
When you’ve rebuilt in the Dane location for a third or fourth time, on the same lot, why should we keep subsidizing the process? At what point do we say “you cannot build here any more”?
2 comments

At the very least houses should be required to be MUCH stronger, able to withstand 185 mph winds, which seems to be the highest ever for a Florida hurricane.
Even if that location is a fire-prone hillside in Los Angeles? Is the gormlessness of a housing choice correlated with the income of the homeowner?