[jadamson]

I didn't misread anything. refulgentis edited his comment after I replied, and the issue seems to stem from his failure to understand the comment I replied to. Without that context, my reply obviously won't make sense either.

The comment I replied to is pretty standard feminist dreck, and if you can't understand it, maybe interlocute them first? Debate is one thing, spoon-feeding you explanations of someone else's comment is another.

Still, I'll give you a hint: both pessimizer and I agree that men and women are physically different - again, I did not misread them in that regard. The difference is that I take that to a logical conclusion, while they are bound by ideology to stop short.

[refulgentis]

What, exactly, did my edits change?

Here's the second sentence of this post you've claimed twice now believes men and women are no different: "There is a massive part of the West who believes that to acknowledge that women are physically different than men is the real sexism."

Genuinely, I hope you're well.

[jadamson]

> Here's the second sentence of this post you've claimed twice now believes men and women are no different

I'm literally not claiming that, lmao. Sorry, but I won't be replying to you further because you're clearly functionally illiterate.

What I said was that:

> both pessimizer and I agree that men and women are physically different

If you don't understand a chain of comments, start from the top, and stop wasting my time.

[refulgentis]

Here's the second sentence of this post you've claimed twice now believes men and women are no different: "There is a massive part of the West who believes that to acknowledge that women are physically different than men is the real sexism."